- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Against Grue Mysteries
Erkenntnis 85 (4):1023-1033 (2020)
Abstract
The paper develops an inductive extension of AGM-style belief base revision theory with the aim of formally implementing Freitag’s :254–267, 2015, Dialectica 70:185–200, 2016) solution to Goodman’s paradox. It shows that the paradox dissolves once belief revision takes place on inductively closed belief bases, rather than on belief sets.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
How Serious Is the Paradox of Serious Possibility?Simone Duca & Hannes Leitgeb - 2012 - Mind 121 (481):1-36.
Bet Accepted: A Reply to Freitag.Christopher Dorst - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (270):175-183.
Ranks for the Riddle. Spohn Conditionalization and Goodman's Paradox.Wolfgang Freitag & Alexandra Zinke - 2016 - In Von Rang und Namen. Philosophical Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Spohn.
Changes of disjunctively closed bases.Sven Ove Hansson - 1993 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (4):255-284.
Belief revision.Hans Rott - 2008 - In Jonathan Eric Adler & Lance J. Rips (eds.), Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 514--534.
Reversing the Levi identity.Sven Ove Hansson - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (6):637 - 669.
The paradox of belief instability and a revision theory of belief.Byeong D. Lee - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):314-328.
Information Structures in Belief Revision.Hans Rott - 2008 - In Johan Van Benthem & Pieter Adriaans (eds.), Philosophy of Information, Vol. 8 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 457–482.
An approximate approach to belief revision.Shangmin Luan, Guozhong Dai & Lorenzo Magnani - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (2):486-496.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-09-22
Downloads
52 (#305,270)
6 months
15 (#164,728)
2018-09-22
Downloads
52 (#305,270)
6 months
15 (#164,728)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
In defence of science: Two ways to rehabilitate Reichenbach's vindication of induction.Jochen Briesen - forthcoming - The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
References found in this work
On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions.Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors & David Makinson - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):510-530.
A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating.Sven Ove Hansson - 1999 - Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fact, Fiction and Forecast.Edward H. Madden - 1955 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16 (2):271-273.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-vk9kt uwo