5 found
Order:
  1.  11
    No Grammatical Gender Effect on Affective Ratings: Evidence From Italian and German Languages.Maria Montefinese, Ettore Ambrosini & Eka Roivainen - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (4):848-854.
    ABSTRACTIn this study, we tested the linguistic relativity hypothesis by studying the effect of grammatical gender on affective judgments of conceptual representation in Italian and German. In particular, we examined the within- and cross-language grammatical gender effect and its interaction with participants’ demographic characteristics on semantic differential scales in Italian and German speakers. We selected the stimuli and the relative affective measures from Italian and German adaptations of the ANEW. Bayesian and frequentist analyses yielded evidence for the absence of within- (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  3
    Can the Humped Animal's Knee Conceal its Name? Commentary On: “The Roles of Shared Vs. Distinctive Conceptual Features in Lexical Access”.Maria Montefinese & David Vinson - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  26
    What is the Right Place for Atypical Exemplars? Commentary: The Right Hemisphere Contribution to Semantic Categorization: A TMS Study.Maria Montefinese, Marco Ciavarro & Ettore Ambrosini - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  8
    Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words.Maria Montefinese, David Vinson, Gabriella Vigliocco & Ettore Ambrosini - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  3
    Catching the Intangible: A Role for Emotion?Maria Montefinese, Ettore Ambrosini, Antonino Visalli & David Vinson - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
    A crucial aspect of Gilead and colleagues’ ontology is the dichotomy between tangible and intangible representations, but the latter remains rather ill-defined. We propose a fundamental role for interoceptive experience and the statistical distribution of entities in language, especially for intangible representations, that we believe Gilead and colleagues’ ontology needs to incorporate.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark