5 found
Mark A. Stone [5]Mark Alan Stone [2]
See also
  1.  33
    Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation.Mark A. Stone - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (3):327-356.
    Denying the antecedent is an invalid form of reasoning that is typically identified and frowned upon as a formal fallacy. Contrary to arguments that it does not or at least should not occur, denying the antecedent is a legitimate and effective strategy for undermining a position. Since it is not a valid form of argument, it cannot prove that the position is false. But it can provide inductive evidence that this position is probably false. In this role, it is neither (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  59
    Models, Chaos, and Goodness of Fit.Stephen H. Kellert, Mark A. Stone & Arthur Fine - 1990 - Philosophical Topics 18 (2):85-105.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  58
    A Kuhnian Model of Falsifiability.Mark A. Stone - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):177-185.
    Thomas Kuhn has argued that scientists never reject a paradigm without simultaneously accepting a new paradigm. Coupled with Kuhn's claim that it is paradigms as a whole, and not individual theories, that are accepted or rejected, this thesis is seen as one of Kuhn's main challenges to the rationality of science. I argue that Kuhn is mistaken in this claim; at least in some instances, science rejects a paradigm despite the absence of a successor. In particular, such a description best (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
  4.  36
    Realism and the Principle of the Common Cause.Mark A. Stone - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):445 - 461.
    Contemporary arguments for scientific realism are typically based on some form of inference to the best explanation. Sometimes such arguments concern the methods of science: given the success of scientific methodology, realism offers the best explanation of this success. Sometimes such arguments concern the content of scientific theories: given observed regularities in nature, explanations must be given of those regularities; the best such explanations will be realist. One forceful explanationist argument about the content of science can be based on Hans (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
  5.  7
    Aristotle's Distinction Between Motion and Activity.Mark A. Stone - 1985 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1):11 - 20.