The Nature of Zeno's Argument Against Plurality in DK 29 B I
Phronesis 17 (1):40-52 (1972)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJean Paul Van Bendegem (1987). Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument. Philosophy of Science 54 (2):295 - 302.
Peter Zinkernagel (1965). Was Zeno Right? Inquiry 8 (1-4):292 – 300.
Karin Verelst (2006). Zeno's Paradoxes. A Cardinal Problem. 1. On Zenonian Plurality. In J. Šķilters (ed.), Paradox: Logical, Cognitive and Communicative Aspects. Proceedings of the First International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication,. University of Latvia Press.
Stephen Makin (1982). Zeno on Plurality. Phronesis 27 (3):223-238.
Stephen Makin (1982). Zeno on Plurality. Phronesis 27 (3):223-238.
Nicholas Huggett (forthcoming). Zeno's Paradoxes. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Sandra Lynne Peterson (1978). Zeno's Second Argument Against Plurality. Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (3):261-270.
William E. Abraham (1972). The Nature of Zeno's Argument Against Plurality in DK 29 B 1. Phronesis 17 (1):40 - 52.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,573 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
