Evaluating the understanding of the ethical and moral challenges of Big Data and AI among Jordanian medical students, physicians in training, and senior practitioners: a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Ethics 25 (1):1-14 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aims To examine the understanding of the ethical dilemmas associated with Big Data and artificial intelligence (AI) among Jordanian medical students, physicians in training, and senior practitioners. Methods We implemented a literature-validated questionnaire to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the target population during the period between April and August 2023. Themes of ethical debate included privacy breaches, consent, ownership, augmented biases, epistemology, and accountability. Participants’ responses were showcased using descriptive statistics and compared between groups using t-test or ANOVA. Results We included 466 participants. The greater majority of respondents were interns and residents (50.2%), followed by medical students (38.0%). Most participants were affiliated with university institutions (62.4%). In terms of privacy, participants acknowledged that Big Data and AI were susceptible to privacy breaches (39.3%); however, 59.0% found such breaches justifiable under certain conditions. For ethical debacles involving informed consent, 41.6% and 44.6% were aware that obtaining informed consent posed an ethical limitation in Big Data and AI applications and denounced the concept of “broad consent”, respectively. In terms of ownership, 49.6% acknowledged that data cannot be owned yet accepted that institutions could hold a quasi-control of such data (59.0%). Less than 50% of participants were aware of Big Data and AI’s abilities to augment or create new biases in healthcare. Furthermore, participants agreed that researchers, institutions, and legislative bodies were responsible for ensuring the ethical implementation of Big Data and AI. Finally, while demonstrating limited experience with using such technology, participants generally had positive views of the role of Big Data and AI in complementing healthcare. Conclusion Jordanian medical students, physicians in training and senior practitioners have limited awareness of the ethical risks associated with Big Data and AI. Institutions are responsible for raising awareness, especially with the upsurge of such technology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical and legal aspects in teaching students of medicine.Pawel Wlasienko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):75-80.
The way of medicine: ethics and the healing profession.Farr A. Curlin - 2021 - Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by Christopher Tollefsen.
Cultural context in medical ethics: lessons from Japan.Tia Powell - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1:4.
Medical ethics course for residents: A preliminary study.Sukran Sevimli - 2021 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics Contents 7 (31):378-384.
Bibliography of society, ethics, and the life sciences.Sharmon Sollitto & Robert M. Veatch (eds.) - 1973 - Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences.
Student Perceptions and Attitude towards Bioethics Teaching to Undergraduate Medical Students.Zoheb Rafique - 2016 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 26 (3):112-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-17

Downloads
17 (#862,032)

6 months
17 (#145,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?