Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce

Hypatia 19 (1):1-24 (2004)
: The underdetermination argument establishes that scientists may use political values to guide inquiry, without providing criteria for distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate guidance. This paper supplies such criteria. Analysis of the confused arguments against value-laden science reveals the fundamental criterion of illegitimate guidance: when value judgments operate to drive inquiry to a predetermined conclusion. A case study of feminist research on divorce reveals numerous legitimate ways that values can guide science without violating this standard.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/HYP.2004.19.1.1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
P. T. Geach (1965). Assertion. Philosophical Review 74 (4):449-465.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

144 ( #13,027 of 1,725,607 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

20 ( #42,222 of 1,725,607 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.