Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce

Hypatia 19 (1):1-24 (2004)
Abstract
: The underdetermination argument establishes that scientists may use political values to guide inquiry, without providing criteria for distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate guidance. This paper supplies such criteria. Analysis of the confused arguments against value-laden science reveals the fundamental criterion of illegitimate guidance: when value judgments operate to drive inquiry to a predetermined conclusion. A case study of feminist research on divorce reveals numerous legitimate ways that values can guide science without violating this standard
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
DOI 10.2979/HYP.2004.19.1.1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,918
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
P. T. Geach (1965). Assertion. Philosophical Review 74 (4):449-465.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

143 ( #11,065 of 1,711,013 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

22 ( #39,630 of 1,711,013 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.