Abba, father: Inclusive language and theological salience
| Abstract | The use of “inclusive language” in Christian discourse poses the question of whether gender is theologically salient in the sense of either revealing theologically significant differences between men and women or prescribing different roles for them. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesPauline Kleingeld (1993). The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant. Philosophical Forum 25:134-150.
Rush Rhees (1998). Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Vittorio Villa (2009). Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments. Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
Sue M. Patterson (1999). Realist Christian Theology in a Postmodern Age. Cambridge University Press.
Wei Liu (2011). An All-Inclusive Interpretation of Aristotle's Contemplative Life. Sophia 50 (1):57-71.
Cass Fisher (2012). Contemplative Nation: A Philosophical Account of Jewish Theological Language. Stanford University Press.
Andrew J. Dell’Olio (1998). Why Not God the Mother? Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):193-209.
H. E. Baber (2008). Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent. Sophia 47 (2):149 - 160.
John W. Cooper (2000). Supplemental but Not Equal. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):116-125.
H. E. Baber (1999). Abba, Father. Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):423-432.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
