Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 61 (4):608-628 (1994)
|Abstract||Duhem's and Quine's holistic theses, when properly understood, allow methodologically responsible ways of resolving a conflict between a theoretical system and experience; they only deny the possibility of doing it in an epistemically persuasive way. By developing a "string" model of scientific tests I argue that the pattern of interaction between the elements of a theoretical system arising in response to multiple adverse data can be helpful in locating a "weak spot" in it. Combining this model with anti-holistic arguments of Popper, Greenwood, and Lakatos significantly reinforces their joint power|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ernan McMullin (1990). Comment: Duhem's Middle Way. Synthese 83 (3):421 - 430.
Don Howard (1990). Einstein and Duhem. Synthese 83 (3):363 - 384.
Philip L. Quinn (1990). Duhem in Different Contexts: Comments on Brenner and Martin. Synthese 83 (3):357 - 362.
Gary Wedeking (1969). Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):375-380.
Darrell P. Rowbottom (2010). Corroboration and Auxiliary Hypotheses: Duhem's Thesis Revisited. Synthese 177 (1):139-149.
Robert Klee (1992). In Defense of the Quine-Duhem Thesis: A Reply to Greenwood. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):487-491.
Morten Søberg (2005). The Duhem‐Quine Thesis and Experimental Economics: A Reinterpretation. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (4):581-597.
F. Weinert (1995). The Duhem-Quine Thesis Revisited. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):147 – 156.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #51,668 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,029 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?