Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:275-286 (2002)
|Abstract||The principle of employment-at-will (EAW) holds that in the absence of an explicit agreement of contractually binding terms of employment, the employment relationship exists so long as both parties will it to continue. In practice, this means that the employer may terminate the employment relationship at any time, for any reason, thus giving rise to cases of wrongful termination. Just cause policies, on the other hand, require that employers follow both substantive and procedural due process in terminating a person’s employment. Most institutions of higher education, public and private, at least implicitly accept the principle of EAW and carry it out in practice. I argue that because of their heritage of Catholic social thought, Catholic universities are obligated to replace the principle and practice of EAW with a just cause policy. I also point out that the very principles underlying Catholic social thought that lead to a rejection of EAW are principles that any highly educated person of good will should accept|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia H. Werhane (2003). Employment-At-Will, Employee Rights, and Future Directions for Employment. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):113-130.
John J. McCall (2003). A Defense of Just Cause Dismissal Rules. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):151-175.
Henry Lowenstein (2001). Two Faces of State University Employment: Ethics in Access to Federal Due Process. Ethics and Behavior 11 (1):39 – 53.
Michael A. Zigarelli (1993). Catholic Social Teaching and the Employment Relationship: A Model for Managing Human Resources in Accordance with Vatican Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (1):75 - 82.
Debra Berman & Douglas M. McCabe (2006). Compulsory Arbitration in Nonunion Employee Relations: A Strategic Ethical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2-3):197 - 206.
Irene Thompson & Audrey J. Roberts (eds.) (1985). The Road Retaken: Women Reenter the Academy. Modern Language Association of America.
Mark V. Roehling (2003). The Employment At-Will Doctrine: Second Level Ethical Issues and Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):115 - 124.
Vivien T. Supangco (2005). Exploring Organizational Determinants and Consequences of Contingent Employment in the Phillipines. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:235-258.
Harry J. Van Buren & Michelle Greenwood (2008). Enhancing Employee Voice: Are Voluntary Employer–Employee Partnerships Enough? Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1).
Harry J. Van Buren & Michelle Greenwood (2008). Enhancing Employee Voice: Are Voluntary Employer-Employee Partnerships Enough? Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):209 - 221.
Douglas M. McCabe & Jennifer M. Rabil (2002). Ethics and Values in Nonunion Employment Arbitration:A Historical Study of Organizational Due Processin the Private Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):13 - 25.
Samuel Gorovitz (1998). Ethical Issues in Graduate Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):235-250.
André Sobczak (2006). Are Codes of Conduct in Global Supply Chains Really Voluntary? Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (2):167-184.
Roger Eugene Karnes (2009). A Change in Business Ethics: The Impact on Employer–Employee Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):189 - 197.
Wanxian Li, Xinmei Liu & Weiwu Wan (2008). Demographic Effects of Work Values and Their Management Implications. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):875 - 885.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?