Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Papers 40 (1):1-25 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper argues against definitions of depiction in terms of the syntactic and semantic properties of symbol systems. In particular, it is argued that John Kulvicki's definition of depictive symbol systems in terms of relative repleteness, semantic richness, syntactic sensitivity and transparency is susceptible to similar counterexamples as Nelson Goodman's in terms of syntactic density, semantic density and relative repleteness. The general moral drawn is that defining depiction requires attention not merely to descriptive questions about syntax and semantics, but also to foundational questions about what makes it the case that depictions have the syntactic and semantic properties they do.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Englebretsen (1985). Semantic Considerations for Sommers' Logic. Philosophy Research Archives 11:281-318.
Ben Blumson (2010). Pictures, Perspective and Possibility. Philosophical Studies 149 (2):135 - 151.
Paul Thompson (1988). Explanation in the Semantic Conception of Theory Structure. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:286 - 296.
J. E. Miller (1985). Semantics and Syntax: Parallels and Connections. Cambridge University Press.
Ben Blumson (2009). Defining Depiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):143-157.
Micah B. Goldwater, Marc T. Tomlinson, Catharine H. Echols & Bradley C. Love (2011). Structural Priming as Structure-Mapping: Children Use Analogies From Previous Utterances to Guide Sentence Production. Cognitive Science 35 (1):156-170.
Ben Blumson (2008). Depiction and Convention. Dialectica 62 (3):335-348.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #30,853 of 738,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?