Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):480-495 (2006)
|Abstract||continues to receive many reviews. Judging by recent reviews, this is a very controversial book. The question considered here is, how can one fairly review a controversial bookparticularly when the book is widely popular and, for a history of economic thought book, a best seller? This essay uses Mirowskis book as a case study to propose one answer for this question. In the process, it will examine how others seem to have answered this question. Key Words: methodology reviews Mirowski Machine Dreams.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Graham Oppy, Review of Dean L. Overman (1997) a Case Against Accident and Self-Organisation New York: Rowman & Littlefield. [REVIEW]
Mark Holowchak (2004). Lucretius on the Gates of Horn and Ivory: A Psychophysical Challenge to Prophecy by Dreams. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):355-368.
Kurt Stocker (2012). The Time Machine in Our Mind. Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
Jean Camp & K. Lewis (2001). Code as Speech: A Discussion of Bernstein V. USDOJ, Karn V. USDOS, and Junger V. Daley in Light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Recent Shift to Federalism. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):21-33.
Stephen R. Palmquist (1989). Kant's Critique of Mysticism. Philosophy and Theology 3 (4):355-383.
Jacques Derrida (2005). Paper Machine. Stanford University Press.
Alan M. Turing (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59 (October):433-60.
Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Michelle Windt (2007). Dreams. In D. Barrett & P. McNamara (eds.), The New Science of Dreaming. Praeger Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #169,995 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?