Research Styles and the Reception of Sociobiology

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (1):19-40 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science as Ideology: The Rejection and Reception of Sociobiology in China.Li Jianhui & Hong Fan - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):567-578.
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Sociobiology.Harmon Holcomb & Jason M. Byron - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pictures, Styles and Purposes.Dominic Lopes - 1992 - British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (4):330-341.
Thought styles: critical essays on good taste.Mary Douglas - 1996 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Is sociobiology a new paradigm?Michael Ruse - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
Ethology, sociobiology and evolutionary psychology.Paul Edmund Griffiths - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 393-414.
Two Styles of Reasoning in Scientific Practices: Experimental and Mathematical Traditions.Mieke Boon - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):255 - 278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
31 (#512,020)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Failures of explanation in Darwinian ecological anthropology: Part II.Andrew P. Vayda - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):360-375.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references