David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):567-578 (2003)
The spread of sociobiology in China is not simply an internal event in the development of science. From the day it was introduced to China, its destiny was closely bound up with the development and change of Chinese society. Although it did not create as great a disturbance as in America, it did have a significant impact in academic circles. However, scholars have paid little attention to these historical events. Today, sociobiology seems outdated and Wilson's grand agenda seems to have faded with the passing of time, but the mark that he made on the history of science is still striking. A review of the process of reception of sociobiology in China is helpful for understanding this theory as well as the society of China.
|Keywords||culture studies Edward O. Wilson evolutionary biology in China social Darwinism sociobiology theory reception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Antti Lepistö (2015). Revisiting the Left-Wing Response to Sociobiology: The Case of Finland in a European Context. Journal of the History of Biology 48 (1):99-136.
Similar books and articles
Tamas Bereczkei (1993). An Intellectual Legacy of the Past: The Reception of Sociobiology in the East-European Countries. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):399-407.
R. Paul Thompson (1980). Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Osamu Sakura (1998). Similarities and Varieties: A Brief Sketch on the Reception of Darwinism and Sociobiology in Japan. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):341-357.
Robert L. Simon (1982). The Sociobiology Muddle:On Human Nature. Edward O. Wilson; The Sociobiology Debate. Arthur L. Caplan; Human Sociobiology: A Holistic Approach. Daniel G. Freedman; Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? Michael Ruse. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (2):327-.
Li En-Chang (2008). Bioethics in China. Bioethics 22 (8):448-454.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
Ping He (2007). On the Phenomenon of “Return to Marx” in China. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):219-229.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Zhengyu Sun (2006). Disputes Over Philosophical Views in the First Half of the Twentieth Century and Development of Contemporary Chinese Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):124-132.
Xiaohe Lu (2009). A Chinese Perspective: Business Ethics in China Now and in the Future. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):451 - 461.
Robert Weatherley (2000). Human Rights in China: Between Marx and Confucius. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):101-125.
Dunhua Zhao (2006). Metaphysics in China and in the West: Common Origin and Later Divergence. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):22-32.
Yunyi Zhang (2007). Philosophy's Predicament and Hegel's Ghost: Reflections on the View That There is “No Philosophy in China”. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):230-246.
Weiqin Zeng & David Resnik (2010). Research Integrity in China: Problems and Prospects. Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):164-171.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads16 ( #220,694 of 1,793,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,411 of 1,793,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?