Dion and theon: An essentialist solution to an ancient puzzle

Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):129-139 (1994)
Abstract
Dion is a full-bodied man. Theon is that part of him which consists of all of him except his left foot. What becomes of Dion and Theon when Dion’s left foot is amputated? Employing the doctrine of sortal essentialism, I defend a surprising answer last defended by Chrysippus: that Dion survives while the seemingly unscathed Theon perishes.
Keywords material constitution  identity puzzles
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI jphil199491338
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Michael B. Burke, Dion and theon: An essentialist solution to an ancient puzzle
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Andrew M. Bailey (2015). Animalism. Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.
Nikk Effingham (2010). Mereological Explanation and Time Travel. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):333-345.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

395 ( #4,781 of 1,934,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

105 ( #3,070 of 1,934,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.