David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):54-62 (2011)
In Lewis reconstructs set theory using mereology and plural quantification (MPQ). In his recontruction he assumes from the beginning that there is an infinite plurality of atoms, whose size is equivalent to that of the set theoretical universe. Since this assumption is far beyond the basic axioms of mereology, it might seem that MPQ do not play any role in order to guarantee the existence of a large infinity of objects. However, we intend to demonstrate that mereology and plural quantification are, in some ways, particularly relevant to a certain conception of the infinite. More precisely, though the principles of mereology and plural quantification do not guarantee the existence of an infinite number of objects, nevertheless, once the existence of any infinite object is admitted, they are able to assure the existence of an uncountable infinity of objects. So, ifMPQ were parts of logic, the implausible consequence would follow that, given a countable infinity of individuals, logic would be able to guarantee an uncountable infinity of objects
|Keywords||mereology plural quantification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Boolos (1985). Nominalist Platonism. Philosophical Review 94 (3):327-344.
Hans Burkhardt, Johanna Seibt & Guido Imaguire (eds.) (forthcoming). Handbook of Mereology. Philosophia Verlag.
Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2009). On the Ontological Commitment of Mereology. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):164-174.
David Lewis (1993). Mathematics in Megethology. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):3-23.
David Lewis (1991). Parts of Classes. Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Enrico Martino & Massimiliano Carrara (2010). To Be is to Be the Object of a Possible Act of Choice. Studia Logica 96 (2):289-313.
Øystein Linnebo, Plural Quantification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Francesca Boccuni (2013). Plural Logicism. Erkenntnis 78 (5):1051-1067.
Adam Morton (1975). Complex Individuals and Multigrade Relations. Noûs 9 (3):309-318.
Helen Morris Cartwright (1993). On Plural Reference and Elementary Set Theory. Synthese 96 (2):201 - 254.
Philippe De Rouilhan (2002). On What There Are. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102:183 - 200.
Francesco Berto & Massimiliano Carrara (2009). To Exist and to Count: A Note on the Minimalist View. Dialectica 63 (3):343-356.
Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley (2006). A Modest Logic of Plurals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):317 - 348.
Simon Hewitt (2012). The Logic of Finite Order. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (3):297-318.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2003). Plural Quantification and Classes. Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):67-81.
Nino Cocchiarella (2008). Infinity in Ontology and Mind. Axiomathes 18 (1):1-24.
Desmond Paul Henry (1991). Medieval Mereology. B.R. Grüner.
Rom Harré & Jean-Pierre Llored (2011). Mereologies as the Grammars of Chemical Discourses. Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):63-76.
Added to index2012-05-05
Total downloads33 ( #58,198 of 1,168,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #85,406 of 1,168,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?