Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):269-294 (2008)
|Abstract||Many contemporary scholars debate whether war should be conceived as a relative evil or a morally neutral act. The works of Augustine may offer new ways of thinking through the categories of this debate. In an early period, Augustine develops the distinction between evil done and evil suffered. Augustine's early treatments of war locate the saint as detached sage doing only good, and immune from evil suffered. In a middle period, he develops a richer picture of the evil suffered on the occasion of the loss of historical goods but fails to develop the implications of this picture as concerns war. Finally, without abandoning emphasis on the avoidance of doing evil, Augustine comes to highlight how evil suffered in war prevents us from speaking simply of good wars. Augustine's ability to hold together senses of evil and their moral significance provides a useful avenue for new thought on this issue|
|Keywords||presumption evil Augustine suffering just war|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adam Morton (2004). On Evil. Routledge.
Michael Gelven (1998). This Side of Evil. Marquette University Press.
Lars Fr H. Svendsen (2010). A Philosophy of Evil. Dalkey Archive Press.
William S. Babcock (1988). Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency. Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):28 - 55.
Charles T. Mathewes (2001). Evil and the Augustinian Tradition. Cambridge University Press.
John Langan (1984). The Elements of St. Augustine's Just War Theory. Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (1):19 - 38.
G. R. Evans (1982). Augustine on Evil. Cambridge University Press.
Robin May Schott (2008). Just War and the Problem of Evil. Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 122-140.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #68,257 of 723,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?