The Ethics of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean

Hastings Center Report 42 (4):24-27 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The decline in providers and facilities that will allow a trial of labor after cesarean forces many women to choose a repeat cesarean. The choice is frequently not much of a choice, however, since the full range of options are often not on the table. This limited “choice” violates obstetricians' obligations both to respect patients' autonomy and to offer them good care. There has been a vigorous but so far not very fruitful debate in the last few years about the lack of access to a trial of labor after cesarean. Some recently released documents express concern about the limited access women have to clinicians and facilities willing to offer a trial of labor after cesarean. But access is likely to remain a problem for the foreseeable future.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Elizabeth Soliday - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):1-2.
Hooked Up.Tanya N. Cook - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):45-61.
Defining reducible risk.Sheryl Burt Ruzek - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (4):383-408.
Birth Reborn -- What Birth Can and Should Be.P. Huntingford - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (1):52-52.
Birth Control and Controlling Birth: Women-Centred Perspectives.J. Bury - 1982 - Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (1):51-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
19 (#794,881)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sonya Charles
Cleveland State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references