David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 25 (1-4):131-152 (1997)
The aim of this essay is to reflect on the Millian, utilitarian argument from truth that is held as one of the most conspicuous answers to the question Why tolerate? This argument postulates that only in a free market of ideas may the truth be discovered. Even the most unpopular idea may contain some truth in it and may contribute to the advancement of knowledge. It further commands us to contest those opinions which are believed to be true vigorously and earnestly to explore some further truth, and to acknowledge their false aspects. The results of free exchange of opinions will either confirm our idea, or bring some doubt to our attention, to cast accounts and maybe change our opinion, at least to some extent. After reflecting on some of the common arguments that are frequently mentioned in this connection, I discuss Mill's formulation of the Truth Principle as it came into expression in his writings. Here I reflect on his article "Law of Libel and Liberty of the Press" which did not receive adequate attention by scholars. I show that it is difficult to reconcile what Mill had to say in this article with what he later said in On Liberty. I further maintain that the Millian view of truth as superior to all other social values might endanger the very ground which the Truth Principle is intended to safeguard, i.e., tolerance. The holding of truth as the most important value might result in harming individuals, and in generating an atmosphere of intolerance.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Ethics Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Raphael Cohen-Almagor (2002). Responsibility and Ethics in the Canadian Media: Some Basic Concerns. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 17 (1):35 – 52.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor (2012). Between Autonomy and State Regulation: J.S. Mill's Elastic Paternalism. Philosophy 87 (04):557-582.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor (2013). Freedom of Expression V. Social Responsibility: Holocaust Denial in Canada. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 28 (1):42 - 56.
Similar books and articles
Keith Lehrer (2005). Coherence and the Truth Connection. Erkenntnis 63 (3):413 - 423.
Alex Baia (2012). Presentism and the Grounding of Truth. Philosophical Studies 159 (3):341-356.
Benjamin Schnieder (2008). On What We Can Ensure. Synthese 162 (1):101 - 115.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). That Truth Exists is More Logical. Think 10 (27):109-112.
Michael Pendlebury (2010). Facts and Truth-Making. Topoi 29 (2):137-145.
Richard Heck & Robert May (forthcoming). Truth in Frege. In M. Glanzberg (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford University Press
Margo Laasberg (2008). Deflationary Truth and Truth-Biology. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):265-283.
Julian Dodd (2001). Is Truth Supervenient on Being? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):69–85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #152,443 of 1,790,256 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,635 of 1,790,256 )
How can I increase my downloads?