A Strong Confirmation Of The Experimenters' Regress

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):493-503 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(94)90063-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

El argumento del regreso del experimentador y la replicación de experimentos.Romina Zuppone - 2010 - Scientiae Studia 8 (2):243-271.
An Internal Answer to the Experimenters’ Regress through the Analysis of the Semantics of Experimental Results and Their Representational Content.Romina Zuppone - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (1):95-123.
Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenters' Regress.Hans Radder - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:63 - 73.
The experimenters' regress reconsidered: Replication, tacit knowledge, and the dynamics of knowledge generation.Uljana Feest - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 58:34-45.
The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentation.Benoı̂t Godin & Yves Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.
How to avoid the experimenters' regress.Allan Franklin - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):463-491.
Vicious Regresses, Conceptual Analysis, and Strong Awareness Internalism.Gregory Stoutenburg - 2015 - Ratio 29 (2):115-129.
Strong and Weak Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Logique and Analyse 224:439-461.
What is an Infinite Regress Argument?Claude Gratton - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Bonjour‘s Self-Defeating Argument for Coherentism.Thomas Grundmann - 1999 - Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):463-479.
Regarding a Regress.Yuri Cath - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):358-388.
Bayesian Confirmation: A Means with No End.Peter Brössel & Franz Huber - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):737-749.
Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Cham: Springer.
Introduction.Jeanne Peijnenburg & Scott F. Aikin - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (2):139-145.
The Paradox of Analogy.David Botting - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):98-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
115 (#153,701)

6 months
10 (#260,500)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

State of the field: Are the results of science contingent or inevitable?Katherina Kinzel - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:55-66.
Catching the WAVE: The Weight-Adjusting Account of Values and Evidence.Boaz Miller - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:69-80.
The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentation.Benoı̂t Godin & Yves Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references