Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):89-93 (2013)
Abstract
In his classic paper, ‘Why abortion is immoral’, Don Marquis argues that what makes killing an adult seriously immoral is that it deprives the victim of the valuable future he/she would have otherwise had. Moreover, Marquis contends, because abortion deprives a fetus of the very same thing, aborting a fetus is just as seriously wrong as killing an adult. Marquis’ argument has received a great deal of critical attention in the two decades since its publication. Nonetheless, there is a potential challenge to it that seems to have gone unnoticed. A significant percentage of fetuses are lost to spontaneous abortion. Once we bring this fact to our attention, it becomes less clear whether Marquis can use his account of the wrongness of killing to show that abortion is the moral equivalent of murder. In this paper, I explore the relevance of the rate of spontaneous abortion to Marquis’ classic anti-abortion argument. I introduce a case I call Unexpected Death in which someone is about to commit murder, but, just as the would-be murderer is about to strike, his would-be victim dies unexpectedly. I then ask: what does Marquis’ account of killing imply about the moral status of what the would-be murderer was about to do? I consider four responses Marquis could give to this question, and I examine what implications these responses have for Marquis’ strategy of using his account of the wrongness of killing an adult to show that abortion is in the same moral category
Keywords info:mesh/Abortion, Spontaneous  info:mesh/Homicide  info:mesh/Ethical Analysis  info:mesh/Pregnancy  info:mesh/Value of Life  info:mesh/Gestational Age  info:mesh/Humans  info:mesh/Adult  info:mesh/Death, Sudden  info:mesh/Ethical Theory  Humans   Abortion, Spontaneous   Death, Sudden   Euthanasia   Morals   Gestational Age   Pregnancy   Homicide   Ethical Analysis   Ethical Theory   Value of Life   Adult   Female  info:mesh/Morals  info:mesh/Female  info:mesh/Euthanasia
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,825
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Marcia Riordan (2009). Chemical Abortion in Australia. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Richard Schoenig (1998). Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-10-05

Total downloads

7 ( #192,777 of 1,100,101 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #127,217 of 1,100,101 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.