David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (3):171-185 (2004)
This paper considers the claim that Hume washostile to religion and religious belief, andhoped for their demise. Part one examines hisapproach to belief, showing how commentatorstake him to see religious belief asnon-natural. Part two challenges thisconclusion by arguing, first, that Hume'sdistinction between natural and artificialvirtue allows the term ``natural'' to coverreligious belief as well; second, that Humehimself never denies religious belief isnatural, and, third, that he takes religion tobe a necessary part of any flourishing society. The target of Hume's critical remarks onreligion, it is then emphasized, are forms of``false'' religion, which arise from thecorrupting influence of passion, hypocrisy,bigotry, enthusiasm, and superstition. Atbest, it is concluded, the claim that Hume washostile to religion requires qualification,while the view that he was in favor of itsactual demise is largely unwarranted.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Benjamin Cordry (2011). A More Dangerous Enemy? Philo's “Confession” and Hume's Soft Atheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):61-83.
Similar books and articles
Steven M. Bayne (2007). Hume on Miracles: Would It Take a Miracle to Believe in a Miracle? Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):1-29.
Michael Murray, Four Arguments That the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief.
M. A. Stewart (1988). Book Review:Hume's Philosophy of Religion. Antony Flew, Donald Livingston, George I. Mavrodes, David Fate Norton; Scepticism and Belief in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Stanley Tweyman. [REVIEW] Ethics 98 (4):859-.
Stanley Tweyman (1986). Scepticism and Belief in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Kluwer Academic.
Terence Penelhum (1997). A Religion Without Talking: Religious Belief and Natural Belief in Hume's Philosophy of Religion Beryl Logan New York: Peter Lang, 1993. Xii + 184 Pp., $42.95 US. [REVIEW] Dialogue 36 (04):856-.
D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) (1999). Religion and Hume's Legacy. St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
P. J. E. Kail (2007). Understanding Hume's Natural History of Religion. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):190–211.
J. C. A. Gaskin (ed.) (1998/2009/2008). David Hume: Principal Writings on Religion Including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and, the Natural History of Religion. Oxford University Press.
Lorne Falkenstein (2003). Hume's Project in ‘the Natural History of Religion’. Religious Studies 39 (1):1-21.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #53,410 of 1,099,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #14,705 of 1,099,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?