David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478 (1999)
Many outside science and engineering, especially social scientists and “rhetoricians”, claim that rhetoric, “the art of persuasion”, is an important part of technical communication. This claim is either trivial or false. If “persuasion” simply means “effective communication”, then, of course, rhetoric is an important part of technical communication. But, if “persuasion” has anything like its traditional meaning (a specific art of winning conviction), rhetoric is not an important part of technical communication; indeed, its use in technical communication would be unethical. [By] an advocate is meant one whose business it is to smooth over real difficulties, and to persuade where he cannot convince.
|Keywords||rhetoric ethics professions technical writing technical communication engineers scientists deception persuasion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Y. Too (1996). G.A. Kennedy: A New History of Classical Rhetoric. An Extensive Revision and Abridgement of The Art of Persuasion in Greece, The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World and Greek Rhetoric Under Christian Emporers With Additional Discussion of Late Latin Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (1):60-61.
Michael Davis (2006). Integrating Ethics Into Technical Courses: Micro-Insertion. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):717-730.
Alan G. Gross & Arthur Walzer (1997). The Challenger Disaster And The Revival Of Rhetoric In Organizational Life. Argumentation 11 (1):85-93.
Carolyn R. Miller (2006). The Rhetoric of RHETORIC: The Quest for Effective Communication (Review). Philosophy and Rhetoric 39 (3):261-263.
Diane Davis (2010). By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication (Review). Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (3):289-295.
Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
Richard A. Cherwitz (ed.) (1990). Rhetoric and Philosophy. L. Erlbaum Associates.
S. Fuller (1999). Some Steps Towards the Recovery of Technical Writing as a Democratic Art: An Historicist Plea for Rhetoric. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):479-483.
Paul B. Thompson (1999). Commentary on “Rhetoric, Technical Writing and Ethics” (Michael Davis). Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):484-486.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #172,583 of 1,102,846 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,846 )
How can I increase my downloads?