Can a Robot Pursue the Good? Exploring Artificial Moral Agency

Journal of Evolution and Technology 24 (3):76-86 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I will explore an understanding of the potential moral agency of robots; arguing that the key characteristics of physical embodiment; adaptive learning; empathy in action; and a teleology toward the good are the primary necessary components for a machine to become a moral agent. In this context; other possible options will be rejected as necessary for moral agency; including simplistic notions of intelligence; computational power; and rule-following; complete freedom; a sense of God; and an immaterial soul. I argue that it is likely that such moral machines may be able to be built; and that this does not diminish humanity or human personhood.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When is a robot a moral agent.John P. Sullins - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 6 (12):23-30.
Moral Machines?Michael S. Pritchard - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):411-417.
Moral agency in other animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Moral Enhancement, Self-Governance, and Resistance.Pei-Hua Huang - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (5):547-567.
Moral Agency, Commitment, and Impartiality.Neera K. Badhwar - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):1-26.
In Praise of Blame.Barbara Houston - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (4):128 - 147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-12

Downloads
59 (#271,933)

6 months
9 (#307,343)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?