Pain cannot (just) be whatever the person says: A critique of a dogma

Nursing Philosophy 24 (4):e12446 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

McCaffery's definition of pain has proven to be one of the most consequential in nursing and healthcare more generally. She put forward this definition in response to the persistent undertreatment of pain. However, despite raising her definition to the status of a dogma, the undertreatment remains a real problem. This essay explores the contention that McCaffery's definition of pain elides critical aspects of it, aspects that demand consideration when treating pain. In section I, I set the stage. I discuss how McCaffery's definition and her understanding of pain science interrelate. In section II, I raise three problems for this understanding. In section III, I argue that these problems stem from an incoherency in her definition. Finally, in section IV, I draw from hospice nursing as well as philosophy and the social sciences to redefine ‘pain’ so that an intersubjective feature of it is foregrounded. I also briefly discuss one implication this redefinition has for pain management.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowing Pain.S. Benjamin Fink - 2012 - In Esther Cohen (ed.), Knowledge and Pain. Rodopi. pp. 84--1.
Knowledge and pain.Esther Cohen (ed.) - 2012 - New York, NY: Rodopi.
Response to Dr. Bernstein.Murat Aydede - 2020 - PAIN Reports 5 (e814):1-1.
Pain, paradox and polysemy.Michelle Liu - 2021 - Analysis 81 (3):461-470.
The politics in/of pain.Charles Djordjevic - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (3):362-388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-06

Downloads
13 (#1,060,918)

6 months
3 (#1,037,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The meaning of 'meaning'.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.

View all 11 references / Add more references