David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):35-58 (2001)
This article attempts to respond to Simon Critchley's claim in a recent debate with Richard Rorty, that the latter, by not fully recognizing its indebtedness to Levinas, misunderstands the political import of the work of Jacques Derrida. I maintain, pace Critchley, that trying to push the Derrida-Levinas connection too far will not only further compound Rorty's view of Derrida as a thinker devoid of political efficacy, but that it will moreover serve to obscure the significant differences which exist between Levinas and Derrida - differences which cannot be overlooked in any serious discussion of the two thinkers in question. In the second half, I try to convince Critchley that what separates Derrida from Levinas is precisely what hooks him up with Rorty at a political level. Both, I argue, are committed to a civic religion of social hope. In so doing, I try to convince Rorty that his caricature of Derrida as a private writer without political consequence, ought now to be seriously reconsidered. Key Words: community • Critchley • democracy • Derrida • ethics • justice • law • Levinas • politics • religion • Rorty • sentiment • singularity • social hope
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Elizabeth Wijaya (2012). To Learn to Live with Spectral Justice: Derrida–Levinas. Derrida Today 5 (2):232-247.
Madeleine Fagan (2009). The Inseparability of Ethics and Politics: Rethinking the Third in Emmanuel Levinas. Contemporary Political Theory 8 (1):5.
Bob Plant (2006). The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein. Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (4):533 - 559.
Madeleine Fagan (2009). The Inseparability of Ethics and Politics: Rethinking the Third in Emmanuel Levinas. Contemporary Political Theory 8 (1):5-22.
Similar books and articles
Simon Critchley (1995). Deconstruction and Pragmatism : Is Derrida a Private Ironist or a Public Liberal? In Philippe van Haute & Peg Birmingham (eds.), European Journal of Philosophy. Kok Pharos 1-21.
Jacques Derrida (2000). Performative Powerlessness: A Response to Simon Critchley. Constellations 7 (4):466-468.
Simon Critchley (2008). Derrida : The Reader. In Robert Eaglestone & Simon Glendinning (eds.), Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy. Routledge 315-326.
Nicholas H. Smith (2005). Rorty on Religion and Hope. Inquiry 48 (1):76 – 98.
Adam Thurschwell, Book Review: Simon Critchley, Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance. [REVIEW]
Simon Critchley (2006). Derrida. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2):315-326.
Eduard Jordaan (2006). Affinities in the Socio-Political Thought of Rorty and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):193-209.
Simon Critchley (2004). Five Problems in Levinas's View of Politics and the Sketch of a Solution to Them. Political Theory 32 (2):172-185.
Bob Plant (2003). Doing Justice to the Derrida–Levinas Connection: A Response to Mark Dooley. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):427-450.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #268,118 of 1,934,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,687 of 1,934,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?