There is no “inference within a model”

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e193 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that there is no viable development of the instrumentalist inference within a model research program. I further argue that both Friston and Pearl blankets are not the right sort of tool to settle debates on philosophical internalism and externalism. For these reasons, the inference within a model program is far less promising than the target article suggests.

Similar books and articles

Introduction to scientific inference.Robert Hooke - 1963 - San Francisco,: Holden-Day.
Inference Without Reckoning.Susanna Siegel - 2019 - In Brendan Balcerak Jackson & Magdalena Balcerak Jackson (eds.), Reasoning: New Essays on Theoretical and Practical Thinking. Oxford University Press. pp. 15-31.
A Defense of a Non-Computational, Interactive Model of Visual Observation.Bonnie Tamarkin Paller - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:135 - 142.
The Role of Unconscious Inference in Models of Delusion Formation.Federico Bongiorno & Lisa Bortolotti - 2019 - In Anders Nes & Timothy Hoo Wai Chan (eds.), Inference and Consciousness. London: Routledge. pp. 74-97.
Psychoanalysis and the Practical Inference Mode.Thomas Donaldson - 1978 - Philosophy Research Archives 4:1-16.
On Probability and Cosmology: Inference Beyond Data?Martin Sahlen - 2017 - In K. Chamcham, J. Silk, J. D. Barrow & S. Saunders (eds.), The Philosophy of Cosmology. Cambridge, UK:
Does IBE Require a ‘Model’ of Explanation?Frank Cabrera - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):727-750.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-01

Downloads
231 (#86,939)

6 months
97 (#46,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Facchin
University of Antwerp

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations