Reasonable Trust through Deliberative Engagement: The Cases of Vaccines and Genome Editing

Social Epistemology 36 (1):111-116 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02691728.2021.2009590

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“Involuntary (Moral) Bioenhancement” Can Add Value to the Debate on Human Germline Genome Editing.Vojin Rakić - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):54-56.
Handservant of Technocracy.Christian Ross - 2022 - Spontaneous Generations 10 (1):63-87.
Reproductive genome editing interventions are therapeutic, sometimes.César Palacios-González - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (6):557-562.
Debating Genome Editing Technologies.Lukas Kaelin - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 187-201.
Untangling the Promises of Human Genome Editing.Katherine Drabiak - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):991-1009.
Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?Giulia Cavaliere - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):215-225.
Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2021 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31 (4):27-39.
Governing, protecting, and regulating the future of genome editing: the significance of ELSPI perspectives.Santa Slokenberga, Timo Minssen & Ana Nordberg (eds.) - 2023 - Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.
Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement.Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews, Alan Regenberg & On Behalf of the Hinxton Group - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
Somatic genome editing with the use of AI : big promises but doubled legal issues.Anastasiya Kiseleva - 2023 - In Santa Slokenberga, Timo Minssen & Ana Nordberg (eds.), Governing, protecting, and regulating the future of genome editing: the significance of ELSPI perspectives. Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.
Theoretical vs Practical Reasons: Derek Parfit and Bioethics.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):1-3.
The application of EU competition law to the exploitation of human genome editing technology.Vladimir Bastidas Venegas - 2023 - In Santa Slokenberga, Timo Minssen & Ana Nordberg (eds.), Governing, protecting, and regulating the future of genome editing: the significance of ELSPI perspectives. Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.
Democracy, Trust, and Epistemic Justice.Amandine Catala - 2015 - The Monist 98 (4):424-440.
Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.Christopher Gyngell, Hilary Bowman-Smart & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (8):514-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
7 (#1,377,350)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Ethical case deliberation and decision making.Diego Gracia - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):227-233.
Deliberative democracy beyond process.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):153–174.

Add more references