The importance of what people care about

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (4):415-447 (2012)
Happiness studies have rekindled interest in the measurement of subjective well-being, and often claim to track faithfully ‘what people care about’ in their lives. It is argued in this article that seeking to respect individuals’ preferences in the context of making intrapersonal and interpersonal comparisons for social evaluation has important and somewhat surprising implications, which shed light, in particular, on subjective measures and their objective alternatives, such as Sen’s capability approach. Four points are made. First, raw subjective well-being scores are problematic because they involve different calibration norms for different individuals or for the same individuals at different times. Money-metric and similar measures appear more attractive in this perspective. Second, if individuals genuinely care about their relative positions, incorporating such relative aspects in the evaluation of individual situations does not necessarily lead to rewarding the selfish and malevolent. Third, in the context of risk, relying on ex ante preferences may clash with a concern for ex post preferences, which are better informed. Fourth, focusing on opportunities or capabilities may fail to respect preferences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X12447775
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,496
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Daniel M. Haybron & Valerie Tiberius (2015). Well-Being Policy: What Standard of Well-Being? Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (4):712--733.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Joseph Raz (2004). The Role of Well‐Being. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):269–294.
H. E. Baber (2010). Worlds, Capabilities and Well-Being. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):377 - 392.
Mozaffar Qizilbash (2007). Social Choice and Individual Capabilities. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):169-192.
R. T. Meulen (2011). How 'Decent' Is a Decent Minimum of Health Care? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):612-623.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #145,763 of 1,911,838 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,838 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.