Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes

Blackwell (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Part I: Inductivism and its Critics:. 1. Some Historical Background: Inductivism, Russell and the Cambridge School, the Vienna Circle and Popper. 2. Popper’s Critique of Inductivism. 3. Duhem’s Critique of Inductivism. Part II: Conventionalism and the Duhem-Quine Thesis:. 4. Poincare’s Conventionalism of 1902. 5. The Duhem Thesis and the Quine Thesis. Part III: The Nature of Observation:. 6. Observation Statements: the Views of Carnap, Neurath, Popper and Duhem. 7. Observation Statements: Some Psychological Findings. Part IV: The Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics:. 8. Is Metaphysics Meaningless? Wittgenstein, the Vienna Circle and Popper’s Critique. 9. Metaphysics in relation to Science: the Views of Popper, Duhem and Quine. 10. Falsification in the light of the Duhem-Quine Thesis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger: A Very Short Introduction.Michael Inwood - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Science After Feminism.Janet A. Kourany - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press.
Conventionalism.Yemima Ben-Menahem - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Conceptual Systems.Harold I. Brown - 2006 - New York: London.
C. S. Peirce and the Hispanic Philosophy of the Twentieth Century.Jaime Nubiola - 1998 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24 (1):31-49.
The development of Machian themes in the twentieth century.Julian B. Barbour - 1999 - In Jeremy Butterfield (ed.), The arguments of time. New York: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press. pp. 83--109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-22

Downloads
192 (#102,910)

6 months
9 (#301,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Gillies
University College London

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references