Advance directives in turkey's cultural context: Examining the potential benefits for the implementation of patient rights
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 24 (3):127-133 (2010)
Advance directives are not a part of the healthcare service in Turkey. This may be related with the fact that paternalism is common among the healthcare professionals in the country, and patients are not yet integrated in the decision-making process adequately. However, starting from the enactment of the Regulation of Patient Rights in 1998, this situation started to change. While the paternalist tradition still appears to be strong in Turkey, the Ministry of Health has been taking concrete measures in the recent years to ensure that patient rights are implemented in healthcare practice. Therefore, Turkey now seems to be in a transitional period where a move towards a more patient-autonomy centred approach is being supported by the regulatory authorities, as well as the academic circles and the public at large. In the light of this background, this paper aims to examine the potential benefits of advance directives, particularly with regard to their possible effect in the clinical decision-making process of Turkey's context. It will be argued that advance directives, if correctly understood and implemented in the right settings, may be beneficial, particularly for improving communication between patients and healthcare professionals and for implementing of the right to refuse treatment.
|Keywords||patient autonomy advance directives patient right the right to refuse treatment paternalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gurkan Sert & Tolga Guven (2013). Examining the Ethico-Legal Aspects of the Right to Refuse Treatment in Turkey. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (10):632-635.
Similar books and articles
David Shaw (2011). A Direct Advance on Advance Directives. Bioethics 26 (5):267-274.
K. I. M. Soyoon, Ki-hyun Hahm, Hyoung Wook Park, Hyun Hee Kang & Myongsei Sohn (2010). A Korean Perspective on Developing a Global Policy for Advance Directives. Bioethics 24 (3):113-117.
G. V. Saracoglu, B. Tokuc, F. Guler & H. Gul (2010). Evaluation of Patient Rights Practices in a Developing Country: The Edirne Model for the Implementation of Patient Rights in Turkey. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):488-493.
Hiroaki Miyata, Hiromi Shiraishi & Ichiro Kai (2006). Survey of the General Public's Attitudes Toward Advance Directives in Japan: How to Respect Patients' Preferences. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-9.
Violeta Be Irević (2010). End-of-Life Care in the 21st Century: Advance Directives in Universal Rights Discourse. Bioethics 24 (3):105-112.
Jim Stone (1994). Advance Directives, Autonomy and Unintended Death. Bioethics 8 (3):223–246.
David J. Doukas, Using the Family Covenant in Planning End-of-Life Care: Obligations and Promises of Patients, Families, and Physicians.
Miguel A. Sanchez-Conzalez (1997). Advance Directives Outside the USA: Are They the Best Solution Everywhere? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (3):283-301.
Leslie Pickering Francis (1993). Advance Directives for Voluntary Euthanasia: A Volatile Combination? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):297-322.
J. Vollmann (2001). Advance Directives in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease; Ethical and Clinical Considerations. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):161-167.
Added to index2010-02-02
Total downloads21 ( #118,151 of 1,696,650 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,998 of 1,696,650 )
How can I increase my downloads?