Reproductive autonomy: A case study

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 9 (2):61-61 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reproductive autonomy has been challenged by the availability of genetic information, disability and the ethics of selective reproduction. Utilitarian and rights-based approaches, as well as procreative beneficence fail to provide compelling reasons for infringing RA, and may even be likened to dangerous eugenics. Parents are not morally obliged to prevent the birth of a disabled child. Society should rather adopt inclusivity, recognising and providing persons with disabilities opportunities for capability and worthwhile lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The best possible child.M. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):279-283.
How Not to Argue for Selective Reproductive Procedures.Eva Feder Kittay - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (2):185-215.
How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.Tamara Kayali Browne - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):195-204.
Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation.D. A. Jensen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):619-623.
Genetic Enhancement and Procreative Autonomy. [REVIEW]David Archard - 2008 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Eugenics, the Genome, and Human Rights.Daniel J. Kevles - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (2):85-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
32 (#495,286)

6 months
6 (#508,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?