Rule-following, objectivity and meaning
Graduate studies at Western
In Bob Hale & C. Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell (1997)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Pagin (2002). Rule-Following, Compositionality and the Normativity of Meaning. In D. Prawitz (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation. Konferenser.
Crispin Wright (2007). Rule-Following Without Reasons: Wittgenstein's Quietism and the Constitutive Question. Ratio 20 (4):481–502.
Claudine Verheggen (2003). Wittgenstein's Rule-Following Paradox and the Objectivity of Meaning. Philosophical Investigations 26 (4):285–310.
Matthew H. Kramer (2007). Objectivity and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Cesare Cozzo (2004). Rule-Following and the Objectivity of Proof. In Annalisa Coliva & Eva Picardi (eds.), Wittgenstein Today. Il poligrafo.
V. Krebs (1986). Objectivity and Meaning: Wittgenstein on Following Rules. Philosophical Investigations 9 (July):177-186.
Crispin Wright (1981). Rule-Following, Objectivity and the Theory of Meaning. In Steven H. Holtzman & Christopher M. Leich (eds.), Wittgenstein: To Follow A Rule. Routledge.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?