Citizens’ Political Responsibility and Collective Identity: A Spinozistic Answer to Jaspers’s Question on Guilt

The Journal of Ethics 23 (2):201-221 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question on guilt that Jaspers poses to the Germans was not only valid after the Holocaust, it can be raised to other peoples who must answer for the crimes committed by the state which act on behalf of the people that gave support to them. In this paper, I elaborate a notion of citizens’ political responsibility in order to argue to what extent—and under what circumstances—the citizens of a political community must respond for the deeds of the political institutions that govern them. For that purpose, I try to explain Spinoza’s notion of political authority in relation to Jaspers’ notion of political guilt. This Spinozistic approach has the advantage of freeing us from moral guilt—a misleading notion in political arena as I will argue—but it demands from us a genuine self-reflective and therapeutic procedure that if applied to politics would reveal a different path from Jaspers’ guilt. The aim of this therapeutic is to bring about a profound change in the personal and political identity of both citizen and political community.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Collective Guilt and Responsibility.Lilian Alweiss - 2003 - European Journal of Political Theory 2 (3):307-318.
Collective guilt and collective guilt feelings.Margaret Gilbert - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (2):115-143.
Personal relations and moral residue.Eleonore Stump - 2004 - History of the Human Sciences 17 (2-3):33-56.
Apology, Reparations, and the Question of Inherited Guilt.Glen Pettigrove - 2003 - Public Affairs Quarterly 17 (4):319-348.
Political testimony.Han van Wietmarschen - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (1):23-45.
Critical Realism and the Metaphysics of Justice.Alan Norrie - 2016 - Journal of Critical Realism 15 (4):391-408.
Collective guilt feeling revisited.Anita Konzelmann Ziv - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (3):467–493.
Hannah Arendt and the Issue of Responsibility.Gordana Dasa Duhacek - 2002 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Collective Guilt and Collective Punishment.George P. Fletcher - 2004 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5 (1):163-178.
The Contrabassist and the CEO: Moral Judgment and Collective Identity.Alessandro Pinzani - 2003 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 2 (2):120–136.
A Question of Guilt.Jens Meierhenrich - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):314-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-05

Downloads
21 (#734,423)

6 months
8 (#353,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wilson Herrera
State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke.Crawford Brough Macpherson - 1962 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press. Edited by Frank Cunningham.
The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke.Crawford Brough Macpherson - 1962 - Don Mills, Ont.: Oup Canada. Edited by Frank Cunningham.
Spinoza.Don Garrett - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):952-955.
The Question of German Guilt.Karl Jaspers - 2008 - In Guénaël Mettraux (ed.), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial. Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references