Social network size in humans

Human Nature 14 (1):53-72 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines social network size in contemporary Western society based on the exchange of Christmas cards. Maximum network size averaged 153.5 individuals, with a mean network size of 124.9 for those individuals explicitly contacted; these values are remarkably close to the group size of 150 predicted for humans on the basis of the size of their neocortex. Age, household type, and the relationship to the individual influence network structure, although the proportion of kin remained relatively constant at around 21%. Frequency of contact between network members was primarily determined by two classes of variable: passive factors (distance, work colleague, overseas) and active factors (emotional closeness, genetic relatedness). Controlling for the influence of passive factors on contact rates allowed the hierarchical structure of human social groups to be delimited. These findings suggest that there may be cognitive constraints on network size

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans.R. I. M. Dunbar - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):681-694.
The decreasing marginal value of evaluation network size.Zheng Dong & L. Jean Camp - 2011 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 41 (1):23-37.
Environmental ethics and size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Neurological models of size scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
The costs and benefits of kin.Craig Hadley - 2004 - Human Nature 15 (4):377-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
97 (#178,219)

6 months
16 (#157,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?