Some observations on induction in predicate probabilistic reasoning

Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):43-75 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider the desirability, or otherwise, of various forms of induction in the light of certain principles and inductive methods within predicate uncertain reasoning. Our general conclusion is that there remain conflicts within the area whose resolution will require a deeper understanding of the fundamental relationship between individuals and properties

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#190,175)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jeffrey Paris
University of Manchester
Manda Hill
Azusa Pacific University

Citations of this work

Atom Exchangeability and Instantial Relevance.J. B. Paris & P. Waterhouse - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):313-332.
A Note on Binary Inductive Logic.C. J. Nix & J. B. Paris - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):735-771.
Inductive influence.Jon Williamson - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):689 - 708.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Theories of Probability.Terrence Fine - 1973 - Academic Press.
Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude.David Miller - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):166-177.
Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability.Rudolf Carnap & Richard C. Jeffrey (eds.) - 1971 - University of California Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references