Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):43-75 (2002)
|Abstract||We consider the desirability, or otherwise, of various forms of induction in the light of certain principles and inductive methods within predicate uncertain reasoning. Our general conclusion is that there remain conflicts within the area whose resolution will require a deeper understanding of the fundamental relationship between individuals and properties|
|Keywords||induction inductive methods probabilistic reasoning uncertain reasoning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John D. Norton (2010). There Are No Universal Rules for Induction. Philosophy of Science 77 (5):765-777.
R. A. Fumerton (1980). Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):589-600.
Rainer Gottlob (1995). Emeralds Are No Chameleons — Why “Grue” is Not Projectible for Induction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (2):259 - 268.
F. Bergadano (1993). Machine Learning and the Foundations of Inductive Inference. Minds and Machines 3 (1):31-51.
Manfred Jaeger (2005). A Logic for Inductive Probabilistic Reasoning. Synthese 144 (2):181 - 248.
Nicholas Rescher (1980). Induction: An Essay on the Justification of Inductive Reasoning. Blackwell.
Bruno G. Bara & Monica Bucciarelli (2000). Deduction and Induction: Reasoning Through Mental Models. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 1 (1):95-107.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,190 of 722,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?