Reduction in genetics--biology or philosophy?

Philosophy of Science 39 (4):491-499 (1972)
A belief common among philosophers and biologists alike is that Mendelian genetics has been or is in the process of being reduced to molecular genetics, in the sense of formal theory reduction current in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to show that there are numerous empirical and conceptual difficulties which stand in the way of establishing a systematic inferential relation between Mendelian and molecular genetics. These difficulties, however, have little to do with the traditional objections which have been raised to reduction
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,715
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
John Cassidy (1978). Naturalistic Ethics: Problem in Reductionism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8 (2):193–216.
Ronald Munson (1974). The Philosophy of Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 5 (1):73-85.
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

21 ( #90,784 of 1,413,361 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #94,237 of 1,413,361 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.