David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 171-205 (2010)
Most commentators agree that Leibniz advocates some version of a doctrine of the ideality or reducibility of relations, but there is considerable disagreement about what exactly this doctrine means. I argue that Leibniz’s views on relations are more complex than has been previously appreciated, and that, despite some ‘reductionist’ strands in Leibniz’s position, it is seriously misleading to describe him as a reductionist about relations without adding some important qualifications. The complexity of Leibniz’s views on relations tends to be obscured by the common assumption that they can be captured in one unified thesis, or a small number of closely related theses, and by the widespread neglect to take Leibniz’s division of reality into several ontological levels into consideration. I disentangle ten Leibnizian theses about relations, extrinsic denominations, and their relation to intrinsic denominations. Some of these theses express a kind of dependence of extrinsic denominations on intrinsic ones, and some of them can even be counted as articulations of a form of reductionism. But, overall, the general tenor of Leibniz’s position on extrinsic denominations remains non-reductionist.
|Keywords||Leibniz reducibility of relations extrinsic denominations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Ari Maunu (2004). Leibnizian Soft Reduction of Extrinsic Denominations and Relations. Synthese 139 (1):143-164.
Ari Maunu (2004). Extrinsic Denominations and Universal Expression in Leibniz. Dialogue 43 (1):83-97.
J. A. Cover (2004). Leibniz on Purely Extrinsic Denominations. The Leibniz Review 14:99-108.
Massimo Mugnai (2009). “On extrinsic denominations” (LH IV, iii, 5a-e, Bl. 15). The Leibniz Review 19:64-66.
Dennis Plaisted (2002). Leibniz on Purely Extrinsic Denominations. University of Rochester Press.
Gary L. Cesarz (2004). Leibniz on Purely Extrinsic Denominations (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):494-495.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (1992). Suárez and the Doctrine of the Transcendentals. Topoi 11 (2):121-133.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2001). Debilissimae Entitates? The Leibniz Review 11:1-22.
Added to index2010-03-31
Total downloads99 ( #40,154 of 1,796,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #55,524 of 1,796,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?