David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 108 (429):69-94 (1999)
Deflationsism about truth is a pot-pourri, variously claiming that truth is redundant, or is constituted by the totality of 'T-sentences', or is a purely logical device (required solely for disquotational purposes or for re-expressing finitarily infinite conjunctions and/or disjunctions). In 1980, Hartry Field proposed what might be called a 'deflationary theory of mathematics', in which it is alleged that all uses of mathematics within science are dispensable. Field's criterion for the dispensability of mathematics turns on a property of theories, called conservativeness. I present some technical results, some of which may be found in Tarski (1936), concerning the logical properties of truth theories; in particular, concerning the conservativeness of adding a truth theory for an object level language to any theory expressed in it. It transpires that various deflationary truth theories behave somewhat differently from the standard Tarskian truth theory. These results suggest that Tarskian theories of truth are not redundant or dispensable. Finally, I hint at an analogy between the behaviour of mathematical theories and of standard (Tarskian) theories of truth with respect to their indispensability to, as Quine would put, our 'scientific world-view'.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hartry Field (2003). A Revenge-Immune Solution to the Semantic Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (2):139-177.
Hannes Leitgeb (2007). What Theories of Truth Should Be Like (but Cannot Be). Philosophy Compass 2 (2):276–290.
Graham E. Leigh & Carlo Nicolai (2013). Axiomatic Truth, Syntax and Metatheoretic Reasoning. Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):613-636.
Leon Horsten (2009). Levity. Mind 118 (471):555-581.
Martin Fischer & Leon Horsten (2015). The Expressive Power of Truth. Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):345-369.
Similar books and articles
James O. Young (2009). Truth, Correspondence and Deflationism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):563-575.
Luis Fernández Moreno (2001). Tarskian Truth and the Correspondence Theory. Synthese 126 (1-2):123 - 147.
Mario Gómez-torrente (1998). Logical Truth and Tarskian Logical Truth. Synthese 117 (3):375-408.
Markus Pantsar (2009). Truth, Proof and Gödelian Arguments: A Defence of Tarskian Truth in Mathematics. Dissertation, University of Helsinki
Jerry Kapus (2007). Truth, Deflationism, and Success. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:85-91.
Cezary Cieśliński (2010). Truth, Conservativeness, and Provability. Mind 119 (474):409-422.
Ryan Christensen (2011). Theories and Theories of Truth. Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Timothy Bays (2009). Beth's Theorem and Deflationism. Mind 118 (472):1061-1073.
Volker Halbach, Axiomatic Theories of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Cezary Cieśliński (2007). Deflationism, Conservativeness and Maximality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):695 - 705.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads94 ( #40,976 of 1,789,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #105,400 of 1,789,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?