Shifting Ontologies, Changing Classifications: plant materials from 1700 to 1830

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (2):261-329 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper studies European chemists’ shifting ontologies of materials by comparing the ways in which they classified materials. The focus is on plant materials, their different identities, and the changing ways chemists sorted out and ordered plant materials in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The main goals of the paper are to follow the development of plant materials from ordinary, everyday materials and commodities in the early eighteenth century to purified carbon compounds and organic substances familiar only to experts in the 1830s, and to reconstruct chemists’ ways of classifying these objects in different practical and intellectual contexts.The study of changes in European chemists’ ways of classifying plant materials over more than a century brings to the foreground a trajectory of ontological shifts that is ‘punctuated’ in the 1750s, the 1790s, and the 1830s. Early eighteenth-century plant materials, which were commodities of the apothecary trade and other arts and crafts, were elevated epistemically as compound components or ‘proximate principles’ of plants in the 1750s, reduced to organic compounds in the 1790s, and replaced by carbon compounds in the 1830s. The last, third transformation of the epistemic constitution of materials and the mode of their classification was accompanied by a deep transformation of the material culture of plant chemistry. After the late 1830s, many of the eighteenth-century vegetable commodities disappeared from chemists’ agenda or were split into different substances individuated and identified in new ways. Coal tar products, and new organic artefacts containing chlorine or bromine, entered the chemical laboratory in the 1820s and became fused with the purified rest of the previous plant and animal substances. The material objects of the new culture of organic chemistry became detached from the materials applied in the extant arts and crafts. It was only in the late 1850s, with the rise of the synthetic dye industry, that a great number of these laboratory substances became involved in industrial production.Keywords: Commodities and scientific objects; Historical ontology; Classification; Plant chemistry; Organic chemistry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paper Tools In Experimental Cultures.Ursula Klein - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):265-302.
Technoscience.Ursula Klein - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):139-141.
Technoscience avant la lettre.Ursula Klein - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):226-266.
Justus Liebig and the Plant Physiologists.Petra Werner & Frederic L. Holmes - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (3):421 - 441.
Viewing chemistry through its ways of classifying.Wolfgang Lefèvre - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):25-36.
The zymotechnic roots of biotechnology.Anthony S. Travis, Willem J. Hornix & Robert Bud - 1992 - British Journal for the History of Science 25 (1):127-144.
Experimental history and Herman Boerhaave’s chemistry of plants.Ursula Klein - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):533-567.
Experimental history and Herman Boerhaave’s chemistry of plants.Ursula Klein - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):533-567.
Material significance in contemporary art.R. Gordon - 2013 - Artmatters: International Journal for Technical Art History 5:1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
38 (#420,547)

6 months
9 (#311,219)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?