Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):77-98 (2002)
|Abstract||I provide a method of measuring the inconsistency of a set of sentences from 1-consistency, corresponding to complete consistency, to 0-consistency, corresponding to the explicit presence of a contradiction. Using this notion to analyze the lottery paradox, one can see that the set of sentences capturing the paradox has a high degree of consistency (assuming, of course, a sufficiently large lottery). The measure of consistency, however, is not limited to paradoxes. I also provide results for general sets of sentences|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron (2009). A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox. Principia 13 (3):299-326.
Tzuchien Tho (2008). The Consistency of Inconsistency. Symposium 12 (2):70-92.
Albert Visser (2012). The Second Incompleteness Theorem and Bounded Interpretations. Studia Logica 100 (1-2):399-418.
Jan Woleński (2010). Truth and Consistency. Axiomathes 20 (2-3):347-355.
Raphael Woolf (2002). Consistency and Akrasia in Plato's Protagoras. Phronesis 47 (3):224-252.
Werner Güth (2002). On the Inconsistency of Equilibrium Refinement. Theory and Decision 53 (4):371-392.
Carlos A. OLLER (2004). Measuring Coherence Using LP-Models. Journal of Applied Logic 2 (4):451-455.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,693 of 722,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?