Empirical Bioethics Research Is a Winner, But Bioethics Mission Creep Is a False Alarm

Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (3):189-193 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While we do not share Evans’s view that social science research is needed to shield bioethics from competitive threat, we incorporate and engage in social science research to inform our knowledge base, our clinical practice, and our contributions to the ongoing development of the field.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

AI Methods in Bioethics.Joshua August Skorburg, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Vincent Conitzer - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics: Empirical Bioethics 1 (11):37-39.
The Need for “Big Bioethics” Research.Richard R. Sharp & Joel E. Pacyna - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (1):3-5.
Design Bioethics and Digital Research Creep.Abraham David Graber - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):66-68.
Design Justice for Design Bioethics.Caitlin Leach - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):63-66.
The politics of bioethics.Alan R. Petersen - 2011 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
6 (#1,454,899)

6 months
4 (#776,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?