Descartes' Error, with Reference to the Third and Fourth Meditations

Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):303-320 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers of mind often assume that methodological solipsism, as outlined in the Second Meditation, is Descartes' last bid on the nature of mental life. This paper argues, instead, that it is a transitional position he overcomes in the dynamic progression of his philosophical therapy. The Third Meditation questions the methodological solipsism that in fact owes much to (received) Cartesian dualism for its dissemination. Descartes' treatment of error has important analogies with Wittgenstein's private language argument. As Lévinas emphasises in his dialogical philosophy, Descartes' proof of God via the concept of error involves recognition of the irreducibility of the Other

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?Brett Gaul - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations.Tom Vinci - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Descartes and other minds.Anita Avramides - 1996 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):27-46.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
The Silence of Descartes.John J. Conley - 1994 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):199-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
75 (#220,615)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Olli Lagerspetz
Åbo Akademi University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references