Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):303-320 (2010)
|Abstract||Philosophers of mind often assume that methodological solipsism, as outlined in the Second Meditation, is Descartes' last bid on the nature of mental life. This paper argues, instead, that it is a transitional position he overcomes in the dynamic progression of his philosophical therapy. The Third Meditation questions the methodological solipsism that in fact owes much to (received) Cartesian dualism for its dissemination. Descartes' treatment of error has important analogies with Wittgenstein's private language argument. As Lévinas emphasises in his dialogical philosophy, Descartes' proof of God via the concept of error involves recognition of the irreducibility of the Other|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Cunning (2007). Semel in Vita: Descartes' Stoic View on the Place of Philosophy in Human Life. Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):165-184.
David Scott (2009). Descartes, Madness and Method. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):153-171.
Omar Edward Moad (2009). Comparing Phases of Skepticism in Al-Ghazālī and Descartes: Some First Meditations on Deliverance From Error. Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 88-101.
John J. Conley (1994). The Silence of Descartes. Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):199-212.
Cecilia Wee (2012). Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23 - 40.
Tom Vinci (2011). Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Brett Gaul (2004). Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
C. G. Prado (2009). Starting with Descartes. Continuum.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads26 ( #47,662 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,152 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?