Philosophy Compass 4 (1):197-218 (2009)
|Abstract||In recent years, several systematic theories of linguistic meaning have been offered that give pride of place to linguistic practice, or the process of linguistic communication. Often these theories are referred to as neo-pragmatist or new pragmatist; I call them 'practice-based'. According to practice-based theories of meaning, the process of linguistic communication is somehow constitutive of, or otherwise essential for the existence of, propositional linguistic meaning. Moreover, these theories disavow, or downplay, the semantic importance of inflationary notions of representation. I introduce the basic ideas and motives behind some practice-based theories of meaning, and offer some reasons why an eliminativist, non-quietist, epistemic practice-based approach to meaning that 1) disavows any explanatory role for the linguistic community as such, 2) prioritizes sentence meaning over word meaning, and 3) may , in the end, be naturalistic, should be favored over its practice-based competitors.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
P. Benner (2011). Formation in Professional Education: An Examination of the Relationship Between Theories of Meaning and Theories of the Self. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):342-353.
Christopher Gauker (1995). A New Skeptical Solution. Acta Analytica 113 (14):113-129.
Mark Risjord (1996). Meaning, Belief, and Language Acquisition. Philosophical Psychology 9 (4):465-475.
Sally McConnell-Ginet (2010). Gender, Sexuality, and Meaning: Linguistic Practice and Politics. Oxford University Press.
H. G. Callaway (2008). Sense and Mode of Presentation. In H. G. Callaway (ed.), Meaning without Analyticity.
Adrienne Lehrer (1970). Theory of Meaning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads76 ( #13,079 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,644 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?