Essay Review: Evolutionary epistemology: a clue to understand moral origins
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (1):109-120 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFranz M. Wuketits (1986). Evolution as a Cognition Process: Towards an Evolutionary Epistemology. Biology and Philosophy 1 (2).
Robert Audi (2008). Rational Disagreement as a Challenge to Practical Ethics and Moral Theory : An Essay in Moral Epistemology. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
M. Coleman (2002). Taking Simmel Seriously in Evolutionary Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):55-74.
I. C. Jarvie (1988). Evolutionary Epistemology. Critical Review 2 (1):92-102.
Philip Dwyer (2010). Necessity and Possibility: The Logical Strategy of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.
H. C. Plotkin (1987). Evolutionary Epistemology as Science. Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):295-313.
Moses L. Pava (2009). The Exaggerated Moral Claims of Evolutionary Psychologists. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):391 - 401.
Michael Bradie (1986). Assessing Evolutionary Epistemology. Biology and Philosophy 1 (4):401-459.
Neil Levy (2010). The Prospects for Evolutionary Ethics Today. EurAmerica 40 (3):529-571.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
