Two-sorted Frege Arithmetic is not Conservative

Review of Symbolic Logic:1-34 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neo-Fregean logicists claim that Hume's Principle (HP) may be taken as an implicit definition of cardinal number, true simply by fiat. A longstanding problem for neo-Fregean logicism is that HP is not deductively conservative over pure axiomatic second-order logic. This seems to preclude HP from being true by fiat. In this paper, we study Richard Kimberly Heck's Two-sorted Frege Arithmetic (2FA), a variation on HP which has been thought to be deductively conservative over second-order logic. We show that it isn't. In fact, 2FA is not conservative over $n$-th order logic, for all $n \geq 2$. It follows that in the usual one-sorted setting, HP is not deductively Field-conservative over second- or higher-order logic.

Similar books and articles

Neo-Logicism and Its Logic.Panu Raatikainen - 2020 - History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (1):82-95.
Frege's Other Program.Aldo Antonelli & Robert May - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (1):1-17.
Predicative fragments of Frege arithmetic.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):153-174.
Finitude and Hume's Principle.Richard G. Heck Jr - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):589 - 617.
Finitude and Hume’s Principle.Richard G. Heck - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):589-617.
The Strength of Abstraction with Predicative Comprehension.Sean Walsh - 2016 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 22 (1):105–120.
Is Hume's Principle Analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):6-30.
Comparing Peano arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume’s Principle.Sean Walsh - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-11

Downloads
530 (#34,203)

6 months
160 (#20,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jeremy Avigad
Carnegie Mellon University
Stephen Mackereth
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Definitions.Anil Gupta - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations