Inquiry 13 (1-4):219 – 237 (1970)
|Abstract||The problem posed in this paper is 'Can those interferences with liberty of expression which are necessary and desirable be indicated in some simple, general way, e.g. in terms of some principle or principles of the kinds with which J. S. Mill sought to delimit the interferences with freedom of action?' It is argued that although J. S. Mill sought to defend 'the fullest freedom of expression', he in fact allowed important interferences of kinds which render the formulation of a principle covering them difficult. Further, it is maintained that the important liberal arguments advanced by the great exponents of liberalism are such that they admit as being necessary, legitimate, and desirable, a wide range and variety of interferences, where these interferences are such that they must be determined in the light of the facts in the concrete situation and not on the basis of some general principle.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Wolff (1998). Mill, Indecency and the Liberty Principle. Utilitas 10 (01):1-.
Alan Haworth (2007). On Mill, Infallibility, and Freedom of Expression. Res Publica 13 (1).
Kenton F. Machina (1984). Freedom of Expression in Commerce. Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406.
Richard Arneson, Listed Below Are Some Examples That Mil Introduces to Help Interpret His Liberty Principle and to Illustrate its Application.
Re'em Segev (2008). Freedom of Expression: Justifications & Restrictions. Israel Democracy Institute.
Jonathan Riley (2005). J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression. Utilitas 17 (2):147-179.
D. H. Monro (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II). Inquiry 13 (1-4):238 – 253.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads27 ( #45,856 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?