Religion, rationality, and language : a critical analysis of Jürgen Habermas' theory of communicative action
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Jurgen Habermas is a second-generation social philosopher of the Frankfurt school, the birthplace of critical theory. He suggests that modernity is a project of substituting rationality for religion. In his analysis, such a succession is the result of a process of social evolution, in which each developmental stage has its basic concepts and modes of understanding subjective, objective, and social worlds. For him, the salient feature of rationality consists of differentiation between various validity claims of truth, truthfulness, and sincerity which are indistinguishable in religious language. The rationalization of religion, hence, progresses in terms of a differentiation between validity claims, a decentration of human understanding, the disenchantment of the world, and the linguistification of the sacred. Habermas proposes a universal pragmatics in which two modes of language use are separated: instrumental-strategic, and communicative. He thinks that the failure of the enlightenment movement to replace religion with reason stems from its preoccupation with instrumental reason and language use, dispensing with communicative rationality; and the remedy lies in communicative rationality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eva Erman (2006). Reconciling Communicative Action with Recognition: Thickening the ‘Inter’ of Intersubjectivity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):377-400.
David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.) (2002). Jürgen Habermas. Sage Publications.
Pieter Duvenage (2010). Communicative Reason and Religion: The Case of Habermas. Sophia 49 (3):343-357.
Andy Wallace (2003). Reason, Society and Religion: Reflections on 11 September From a Habermasian Perspective. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (5):491-515.
Joseph Heath (1996). Rational Choice as Critical Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (5):43-62.
J. M. Bernstein (1995). Recovering Ethical Life: Jürgen Habermas and the Future of Critical Theory. Routledge.
Lawrence B. Solum (1989). Freedom of Communicative Action. Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
Gerhard Wagner & Heinz Zipprian (1991). Intersubjectivity and Critical Consciousness: Remarks on Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action. Inquiry 34 (1):49 – 62.
Aydan Turanl (2008). On Juren Habermas's Misinterpretation of J.L. Austin. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:237-243.
Lorraine Landry (2000). Beyond the 'French Fries and the Frankfurter': An Agenda for Critical Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):99-129.
Added to index2011-01-07
Total downloads14 ( #314,307 of 1,940,962 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,978 of 1,940,962 )
How can I increase my downloads?