Evolving Conceptions of Human Rights as a Bourdieusian Distinction Strategy: A Critical Perspective on Policies Targeting Muslim Populations

Human Rights Review 21 (1):21-42 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines post-9/11 efforts by Western governments to instill respect for human rights among the world’s Muslim populations. The article argues that Western discourses on human rights are best conceptualized as a hegemonic Bourdieusian distinction strategy. In a dynamic strategy of this type, new human rights norms are continually produced and subverted by liberal elites in the West. Because these norms are constantly evolving, Muslim social practices can never “catch up” to them. This produces a perpetual distinction between a progressive liberal Occident and a backwards illiberal Orient, justifying the perpetual hegemony of the former over the latter. In developing its analysis, the article gives special attention to right-wing nationalist movements in Europe and the USA and US foreign policy in the Middle East. These developments are situated in relationship to liberal imperialism in the Colonial era, the Global War on Terrorism, and recent concerns over immigration.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Islam and Human Rights Nexus: Shifting Dimensions.Ann Elizabeth Mayer - 2007 - Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 4 (1).
Grounding human rights.David Miller - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):407-427.
Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Thresholds.Simon Caney - 2010 - In Stephen Humphreys (ed.), Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. pp. 69-90..
Examining Islam and Human Rights from the Perspective of Sufism.Fait A. Muedini - 2010 - Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 7 (1).
Toward a political conception of human rights.Kenneth Baynes - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (4):371-390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-22

Downloads
16 (#905,800)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empire.Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Homo sacer.Giorgio Agamben - 1998 - Problemi 1.
Orientalism.Edward Said - 1978 - Vintage.
Empire.Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri - 2000 - Science and Society 67 (3):361-364.

View all 10 references / Add more references