Why Code of Conduct Violations go Unreported: A Conceptual Framework to Guide Intervention and Future Research

Journal of Business Ethics 57 (4):327-341 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

. The ability to enforce the provisions of a code of conduct influences whether the code is effective in shaping behavior. Enforcement relies in part on the willingness of organization members to report violations of the code, but research from the business and educational environment suggests that fewer than half of those who observe code violations follow their organizations procedures for reporting them. Based on a review of the literature in the business and educational environments, and a survey of 3605 students at a mid-sized comprehensive university, this paper attempts to make conceptual sense of the non-reporting phenomenon. We present a conceptual framework based on four distinct factors which we have labeled: (1) factual non-responsibility; (2) moral non-responsibility; (3) consequential exoneration; and, (4) functional exoneration. Each of these factors suggest a different remedial strategy as well as provide a theoretical foundation for future research. Testable propositions for future research are developed, and some implications for organization leaders are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Australian Research Code.Kevin McGovern & Khalafzai - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (3):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#254,432)

6 months
14 (#174,667)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?