Reaching the “hardwig limit”: Nonscientists' ability to sniff out scientific bias and to judge scientific research methods (response to grandy)

Science Education 79 (2):223-227 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific integrity and the market for lemons.Richard C. Cottrell - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (1):1747016113494651.
On the Cognitive Analysis o f Scientific Controversies.Richard E. Grandy - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 67.
Scientific Change.Hanne Andersen & Brian Hepburn - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Understanding bias in scientific practice.Nancy E. Shaffer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):97.
Science and Play.Michael Goldman - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:406-414.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
6 (#1,443,383)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references